Tuesday, May 30, 2006

gay policy

sexual harassment      will not be tolerated
            in the american workplace

this policy includes      unwanted advances of
            a homosexual nature

since 1964      discrimination based on
            race, religion, gender, or age

has been deemed illegal      and such harassment creates
            a hostile work environment

                        .      .      .

            a response on gay relations
by the grand ayatollah      ali al-sistani

            confirmed that homosexuals
should be killed in "the worst most      severe way of killing"

            sexually purifying
iraq of gays is a goal      of some badr corps cells

            who also kill unveiled women,
people who wear western clothes      and alcohol sellers

                        .      .      .

it is not illegal      in america for you
            to ask a same-sex co-worker

for a date while at work      if the response is a firm
            refusal, you may not tell him

or her that his or her      tushy is going to waste
            nor may you call him or her 'bitch'

                        .      .      .

            a badr death squad officer,
pretending to be gay, joined      an internet chat room

            and lured 27-year-old
ammar of baghdad into      a rendezvous this past

            january--within the hour,
bound, blindfolded, he was shot      in the back of his head

                        .      .      .

at work, if you witness      gay bashing of any kind
            your responsibility is

to tell a manager      it is both illegal and
            against company policy

                        .      .      .

            gay iraqi activists plead
with americans in the      green zone, but are laughed at

            current policy being to
not interfere while iraq      nears mandating gay deaths

                        .      .      .

americans must meet      in conference rooms to watch
            sexual harassment programs

            iraqi homosexuals
must meet in dimly lit rooms      or be killed in pogroms






.

~~~~~~~~~~~~
3/23/06

Monday, May 29, 2006

Will the Soul Patrol get behind Pinsky?

Last week, it was Katharine McPhee & Taylor Hicks.

But it was also Paul Muldoon & Thylias Moss, who each had 15 minutes to write a poem directly following being given the theme. Online right now, you can see how their poems developed on the page, how and when each letter went up, and the editing as it was done.

Tomorrow night at 9:00PM Eastern, it will be Julianna Baggott & Robert Pinsky at Quick Muse.

Read all about it in the NYT here: On Your Marks, Get Set, Poeticize: Dueling Poets on the Web.

Soul Patrol! Whooooo!

Sunday, May 28, 2006

Being Pro-Poetry

This world of poetry is rife and riven with competition and perceived heirarchal pressures. We need more individuals and organizations, or more individuals and organizations visible, getting behind the poetry rock, pushing it up the mountain to where it belongs, where society wants it, and where people outside the poetry community know it ought to be, for the good health of all society.

Poetry is often put down, through competitive impulse, sense of shame, or fear--whether these impeti are rooted in the perceived only or in reality. It is time to be free, to be freed by ourselves first. It is time to place the current unhealthy psychosocial positions of the community of Western poets, into the unreal where they belong.

Worst case scenarios for poets occur where, over the world, poets are being arrested and killed for writing poetry. But so-called "free" societies work subtly and powerfully upon human natures, poets being both human and natural.

As a child, often when my younger sisters would sing, I would tell them to be quiet, that I did not want to hear it. Now, I want everyone singing, in the sense of allowing poetry to flow from our cultures. Some say we have too many writers, and not enough readers. Let us worry less about audience, and more about community. For this is where our strength comes from, and this is where our most powerful messages, our most playful word crafting, most beautiful songs, and greatest shamanistic utterings, go forth from.

This past century, a shame came to poetry. The willy-nilly idea that great musings would lead to great society, destined the moderns into taking blame for the holocaust and other atrocities, in the most atrocious century ever. Poetry, especially from the West, seemed to have been leading culture nowhere special indeed, but making matters horrifically worse. Western culture, and therefore Western poetry, was called to judgment. And it has been quite a trial.

We said, don't sing romantic, don't sing modern, anymore. Beat counterculture, Eastern maybe, ancients revisited maybe, plus the great postmodern movement came into being. Some great poetry has come from it.

Nowadays we have the Collins/Kooser movement of accessibility, with the idea of inclusion--readability, and audience. More don'ts. "Don't sing difficult themes" is the song. "We're doing this, not that, now," comes the call from up the heirarchy. "Communicate--be sure what you're saying is clear," they say. Not Collins and Kooser, if you listen, but those hopping on the bandwagon with the banners of those poets. Again and still, the moderns are to blame. But, according to this movement, the postmoderns are no help at all, impotent, in fact counterproductive--as if we need to produce poetry with an eye toward consumption and demographics.

Let's instead pick up where we got hurt. Let's say "Not guilty." Let's not shut down roads, because we find murderers use them too. Let's stop being underground. Let's be strong in community, savvy now, and visible again.

Bud Bloom

(Think of this more as a bud, than a bloom)

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Stats